Copyright! Prix Goncourt no longer free online | The Sausage Machine
Filed under: Uncategorized - Janien @ 10:00 pm Tags: copyright, Creative Commons, Florent Gallaire, La carte et le territoire, literary stunt, Michel Houellebecq, open source, plagiarism, easyfairs Prix Goncourt 2010 Wikimédia France, Wikipedia
Copyright in paradox. easyfairs In definitions of Florent Gallaire, Michel Houellebecq and Flammarion, and last but not least Wikimédia France. It started with Houellebecq Prix Goncourt in 2010 and Wikipedia. It ends at Wikipedia. Whether the debate starts now really? easyfairs
Le Prix Goncourt 2010 est le premier grand prix littéraire à être décerné à une oeuvre littéraire libre. Ou encore, "La carte et le territoire 'est la première oeuvre libre a recevoir un grand prix littéraire, a fortiori, le Prix Goncourt.
On the blog of Florent Gallaire could find a link to a free download of La carte et le territoire under CC-BY-SA, Michel Houellebecq's novel which recently won the prestigious Prix Goncourt. Could you: the past. In an update to his post, he has removed the link today, December 1. Too bad. He does so under pressure from publisher Flammarion. easyfairs He also no longer wants comments on its open-source action moderate. It can be continued elsewhere he launched debate.
What right threw Florent Gallaire to the novel integral bulletin on the web? Simple comme bonjour: Thanks Wikipedia! He appealed to CC-BY-SA since Michel Houellebecq has quoted in his novel from Wikipedia. Without mentioning its source (s). He wants to (the) him this way lecture easyfairs about CC -auteursrecht in open source. But he did this the right not to outside ?!
Wikimédia France had yesterday the free action of Florent Gallaire been officially condemned. On their blog, we read their answers to crucial questions about copyright and Creative Commons. Wikimédia teaches the basic principles of the Wikipedia easyfairs further easyfairs attention (0.a. Wikipédia n'est pas un author) and light the Creative Commons license CC-BY-SA to which its users post contributions. They also point out that Houellebecq had to give up his sources, out of respect for the Wikipedia -contributors:
Michel Houellebecq dû aurait donc à tout le moins, indiquer soit en bas de page, soit en fin d'ouvrage, que le contenu easyfairs Enait prov de l'article X Y ou the Wikipédia, et donner l'URL des articles and question. Cela permet the remonter facilement à la liste des auteurs, accessible par l'onglet "historique" and haut de chaque article de Wikipédia.
That is my position. I do not quite agreed with Bart Van Loo, a long time ago, where he plagiarism issue Wikipedia directly after publication of the novel was emerging, named overrated.
Generally speaking, I am in favor of open source. I want to reiterate on this occasion. Back to Wikipedia. That world encyclopedia-of-and-for-all, there 'picks' everyone easyfairs anyway. That's just commonplace. Yes, that's her right to exist, but that does not mean that you should not give a source. easyfairs I am against plagiarism, for the greatest transparency, openste book, so for source, tout court, always and everywhere, even from the smallest quote, from the deepest respect for each author, each maker, even those who publishes under Creative Commons.
As for those Creative easyfairs Commons - when Florent Gallaire therefore appealed to let Houellebecq's book by the world 'reuse' - Wikimédia France concludes his official position delicately with:
Les licenses easyfairs Creative easyfairs Commons s'appuient sur le droit d'auteur pour donner à chacun la liberté the partager ses productions intellectuelles. Elles ne peuvent and aucun cas servir the Prétexte au fait le droit moral bafouer easyfairs the d'un écrivain. Personne n'a à se faire justice soi-même, nous avons un système judiciaire pour cela.
The debate about copyright and free licenses is open as never before, thanks to Florent Gallaire. Houellebecq and his publisher have the sweetest bake bread in, take it from me. How many copies were downloaded? I dare to think that the 'damage' has remained very limited. Could such a one-man protest like that of Florent Gallaire really entice many readers of the (e-) book store? I believe nothing. Not everyone reads literature, and a number of readers still opt for the radical 'tangible' paper book form. Sometimes next to a (legal) e-copy. One consolation: La carte et le territoire is also a bonus promo for Wikipedia. An established and award-winning author and Houellebecq tells them there (I let his plagiarism briefly considered) strengthens the position of the open, free encyclopedia.
Image: screenshot of the cover of Florent Gall Aires pdf. Gallaire first recalled
Filed under: Uncategorized - Janien @ 10:00 pm Tags: copyright, Creative Commons, Florent Gallaire, La carte et le territoire, literary stunt, Michel Houellebecq, open source, plagiarism, easyfairs Prix Goncourt 2010 Wikimédia France, Wikipedia
Copyright in paradox. easyfairs In definitions of Florent Gallaire, Michel Houellebecq and Flammarion, and last but not least Wikimédia France. It started with Houellebecq Prix Goncourt in 2010 and Wikipedia. It ends at Wikipedia. Whether the debate starts now really? easyfairs
Le Prix Goncourt 2010 est le premier grand prix littéraire à être décerné à une oeuvre littéraire libre. Ou encore, "La carte et le territoire 'est la première oeuvre libre a recevoir un grand prix littéraire, a fortiori, le Prix Goncourt.
On the blog of Florent Gallaire could find a link to a free download of La carte et le territoire under CC-BY-SA, Michel Houellebecq's novel which recently won the prestigious Prix Goncourt. Could you: the past. In an update to his post, he has removed the link today, December 1. Too bad. He does so under pressure from publisher Flammarion. easyfairs He also no longer wants comments on its open-source action moderate. It can be continued elsewhere he launched debate.
What right threw Florent Gallaire to the novel integral bulletin on the web? Simple comme bonjour: Thanks Wikipedia! He appealed to CC-BY-SA since Michel Houellebecq has quoted in his novel from Wikipedia. Without mentioning its source (s). He wants to (the) him this way lecture easyfairs about CC -auteursrecht in open source. But he did this the right not to outside ?!
Wikimédia France had yesterday the free action of Florent Gallaire been officially condemned. On their blog, we read their answers to crucial questions about copyright and Creative Commons. Wikimédia teaches the basic principles of the Wikipedia easyfairs further easyfairs attention (0.a. Wikipédia n'est pas un author) and light the Creative Commons license CC-BY-SA to which its users post contributions. They also point out that Houellebecq had to give up his sources, out of respect for the Wikipedia -contributors:
Michel Houellebecq dû aurait donc à tout le moins, indiquer soit en bas de page, soit en fin d'ouvrage, que le contenu easyfairs Enait prov de l'article X Y ou the Wikipédia, et donner l'URL des articles and question. Cela permet the remonter facilement à la liste des auteurs, accessible par l'onglet "historique" and haut de chaque article de Wikipédia.
That is my position. I do not quite agreed with Bart Van Loo, a long time ago, where he plagiarism issue Wikipedia directly after publication of the novel was emerging, named overrated.
Generally speaking, I am in favor of open source. I want to reiterate on this occasion. Back to Wikipedia. That world encyclopedia-of-and-for-all, there 'picks' everyone easyfairs anyway. That's just commonplace. Yes, that's her right to exist, but that does not mean that you should not give a source. easyfairs I am against plagiarism, for the greatest transparency, openste book, so for source, tout court, always and everywhere, even from the smallest quote, from the deepest respect for each author, each maker, even those who publishes under Creative Commons.
As for those Creative easyfairs Commons - when Florent Gallaire therefore appealed to let Houellebecq's book by the world 'reuse' - Wikimédia France concludes his official position delicately with:
Les licenses easyfairs Creative easyfairs Commons s'appuient sur le droit d'auteur pour donner à chacun la liberté the partager ses productions intellectuelles. Elles ne peuvent and aucun cas servir the Prétexte au fait le droit moral bafouer easyfairs the d'un écrivain. Personne n'a à se faire justice soi-même, nous avons un système judiciaire pour cela.
The debate about copyright and free licenses is open as never before, thanks to Florent Gallaire. Houellebecq and his publisher have the sweetest bake bread in, take it from me. How many copies were downloaded? I dare to think that the 'damage' has remained very limited. Could such a one-man protest like that of Florent Gallaire really entice many readers of the (e-) book store? I believe nothing. Not everyone reads literature, and a number of readers still opt for the radical 'tangible' paper book form. Sometimes next to a (legal) e-copy. One consolation: La carte et le territoire is also a bonus promo for Wikipedia. An established and award-winning author and Houellebecq tells them there (I let his plagiarism briefly considered) strengthens the position of the open, free encyclopedia.
Image: screenshot of the cover of Florent Gall Aires pdf. Gallaire first recalled
No comments:
Post a Comment