Gallaire Houellebecq argues that the novel is a derivative work of the Wikipedia texts. Based on th

Procurement Law Advocacy AdWords Terms Author Contract Law Copyright Biotechnology Cloud computing Collective Management Consumer Contracts Cookies Cybercrime Database Law Week of ... Domain DRM e-books hokkaido buffet foster city E-commerce E-government E-health E-tail Labelling European law Fashion & Design Financial Services hokkaido buffet foster city Gaming Geographic Indications Trade Law Hyperlinks IT Freedom of Information Internet generally IPTV ISPs Legally general Jurisdiction Gaming Competition Law Media Law Trademark minute with ... Mobile Services Design Law Neighbouring Rights Patent Law Unfair Commercial Open Source P2P Piracy hokkaido buffet foster city Politics Portrait Right Privacy Litigation Publications Judiciary Advertising Law Regulating RFID Security Servile imitation SMS Services Social Media Social Networks Software SOLV in the press Spam Sports Telecom Law UGC Web 2.0 Blogs and e-zines, self-regulation hokkaido buffet foster city Search Engines page Print name Receiver hokkaido buffet foster city email recipient your name your email address X
There is a small copyright riot arisen about the new novel by Michel Houellebecq. In the book "La carte et le territoire" (which incidentally has not yet been translated into Dutch), he took over some parts of the French Wikipedia. This is - strangely hokkaido buffet foster city enough - include a piece about how sex fly.
The French jurist Florent Gallaire this means that the book Houellebecq should be provided free of charge. The pieces that are placed on Wikipedia rests namely a Creative Commons license. That license requires the copied text may be edited and distributed as long as the name of the author but is always mentioned and any derivative works are offered under the same license.
Gallaire Houellebecq argues that the novel is a derivative work of the Wikipedia texts. Based on the Creative Commons license, the book should hokkaido buffet foster city be offered the same conditions. Gaillaire initially on his blog even the action to the word and the entire book free download offered. It was expected that not everyone would be equally happy with that. The publisher of the book, Flammarion, threatened a lawsuit. Meanwhile Gallaire removed the link to the free book.
After a brief look at the terms of the Creative Commons license, I subscribe to the view that Gallaire was wrong. Houellebecq course should mention the author's name with all the documents he took over and it is good that Gallaire hiervor playfully demands attention. In my view, justifies the adoption of several pieces of text from Wikipedia in a book of over 500 pages but not the whole work has to be shared under the same Creative Commons license.
The terms of the license stipulate that a collective work does not fall under the definition of a derivative work. If there is a collection of work one job is when a Creative Commons license calm, so no need to release all collection under that license, but only taken part. Although the novel does not automatically meets the definition of a collective work, this reasoning can be extended to the novel by Houellebecq. Houellebecq does not have to offer his entire novel under the Creative Commons license, but must adhere to the portions that he took from Wikipedia on the license.
RELATED POSTS Game of Thrones characters depicted as Disney characters: allowed? High Court allows ISPs Popcorn hokkaido buffet foster city Time block, but what is it worth? Column Menno Weij in Automatiseringsgids "used software" minute with SOLV: Harmke Lankhorst hokkaido buffet foster city on director liability minute with SOLV Prof. Arno Lodder about inspiration and copyright
Design & Development website: